  |
Winter
Guest
|
 Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 8:25 pm Post subject: Constitution Party YES, Ron Paul, NO |
 |
|
|
I haven't read thru this thread yet. Just piping up to state that I'm voting for Chuck Baldwin in November. Ron Paul failed to impress me during the Values Voters debates several months ago.
Founding fathers would not have supported homosexuals marrying or getting unique civil rights like married couples. Ron Paul, though saying he's against it, would obviously cave-in on the issue at some point. His logic against it was so weak:
"Just tell the judges to look up the definition of marriage in a dictionary!"
Yeah, as if activist judges need to consult a dictionary to push destructive behavior through their court.
I hope that the Republican Party will lose and see the number of votes garnered by the Constitution Party and KNOW that people want them to get back to the core values that will keep America from slouching toward Gomorrah. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Winter
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 8:27 pm Post subject: Constitution Party YES Ron Paul NO |
|
|
|
I haven't read thru this thread yet. Just piping up to state that I'm voting for Chuck Baldwin in November. Ron Paul failed to impress me during the Values Voters debates several months ago.
Founding fathers would not have supported homosexuals marrying or getting unique civil rights like married couples. Ron Paul, though saying he's against it, would obviously cave-in on the issue at some point. His logic against it was so weak:
"Just tell the judges to look up the definition of marriage in a dictionary!"
Yeah, as if activist judges need to consult a dictionary to push destructive behavior through their court.
I hope that the Republican Party will lose and see the number of votes garnered by the Constitution Party and KNOW that people want them to get back to the core values that will keep America from slouching toward Gomorrah. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Toxic
Forum Elder
Joined: 25 Dec 2007
Posts: 1555
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 8:08 am Post subject: Re: Constitution Party YES Ron Paul NO |
|
|
|
| Quote: | | Founding fathers would not have supported homosexuals marrying or getting unique civil rights like married couples. |
Yeah, just like they wouldn't (didn't!) support equality for women or blacks either.
Please note that this isn't a direct argument against your argument. I'm simply pointing out how ridiculous it is to base your argument on "well the Founding Fathers didn't put it in the Constitution; therefore, it is wrong." The Founding Fathers were not gods; they are capable of fault on (rare) occasion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Rather sad that you compare voting rights for women to perverted people living perverted lifestyles. There is no room in any political party (that I'd join) for practicing homosexuals, nor pedophiles, nor drug dealers, nor wife beaters, nor practicing prostitutes, nor any other the other abominable self-destructive lifestyles.
Call me narrow-minded or whatever...but the truth of these issues is known to the wise. The fool will split hairs over each one all day long. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Winter
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:42 pm Post subject: Founding Fathers |
|
|
|
Exactly.
For the record, indentured servitude is OK with me if it's something the servant willingly signs onto in the beginning. I don't like the fact that Negroes were rounding up other Negroes in Africa for Europeans to sell off like cattle. In their backward world though, conquering other tribes entitled them to all the spoils. But that's an issue better taken up with Afrocentrists who insist Africa(ns) has/have always been the highest order (of people). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Toxic
Forum Elder
Joined: 25 Dec 2007
Posts: 1555
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 9:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Do not feed the trolls. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|
|
|
|
