jusdeadphunky
Forum Elder
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
Posts: 2222
|
 Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 11:32 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
[quote]
Clinton cheated on his wife, lied about it under oath to 300 million people in violation of Federal law, and tried to avoid impeachment by killing 10, 000 Iraqis in bombing raids on civilian targets under the pretense of enforcing "no-fly" zones.
| Quote: | | Yes, that's right, bubba bombed iraq to avoid impeachment. That makes plenty of sense. |
it can be argued that clinton bombed iraq to divert media attention from his impeachment proceedings. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
exton
Forum Elder
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Posts: 4218
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 12:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jusdeadphunky wrote: |
| Quote: | | Yes, that's right, bubba bombed iraq to avoid impeachment. That makes plenty of sense. |
it can be argued that clinton bombed iraq to divert media attention from his impeachment proceedings. |
It can also be argued that i own an invisible pink unicorn.
Much like the argument you mention, though, it will inevitably fail. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
exton
Forum Elder
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Posts: 4218
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 12:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| G-Max wrote: | | exton wrote: |
Yes, that's right, bubba bombed iraq to avoid impeachment. That makes plenty of sense. |
You obviously weren't paying attention to the news at the time. He started bombing Iraq on the very same day when imperachment proceedings were scheduled to begin, and Congress decided to delay impeachment as a result. |
So you're changing your story now?
Because the correct way to describe that version is:
"Clinton changed the timing of his attack on iraq to coincide with, and thus delay, the impeachment hearings".
But that's not what you said. You said that he bombed iraq to distract from the impeachment hearings. That implies that, if clinton were never impeached, then he never would have bombed iraq, which is obviously incorrect.
| Quote: |
| exton wrote: | | Gingrich opposed clinton in balancing the budget. |
If by that you mean "Clinton opposed Gingrich's attempts to balance the budget", then yes, you'd be correct. |
[/quote]
We've always been at war with eurasia! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jusdeadphunky
Forum Elder
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
Posts: 2222
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 12:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| exton wrote: | | jusdeadphunky wrote: |
| Quote: | | Yes, that's right, bubba bombed iraq to avoid impeachment. That makes plenty of sense. |
it can be argued that clinton bombed iraq to divert media attention from his impeachment proceedings. |
It can also be argued that i own an invisible pink unicorn.
Much like the argument you mention, though, it will inevitably fail. |
i was not arguing in favor of that notion. i was just pointing it out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
exton
Forum Elder
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Posts: 4218
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 12:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I know. And i was just pointing out that you can, in fact, argue for literally anything. Thus making the ability to argue for something irrelevent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jusdeadphunky
Forum Elder
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
Posts: 2222
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 12:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| exton wrote: | | I know. And i was just pointing out that you can, in fact, argue for literally anything. Thus making the ability to argue for something irrelevent. |
true |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
G-Max
Not a Newbie
Joined: 10 Mar 2007
Posts: 62
Location: The People's Soviet Socialist Republic of California
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 2:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| exton wrote: |
But that's not what you said. You said that he bombed iraq to distract from the impeachment hearings. |
No, that's what phunky said.
| exton wrote: | | We've always been at war with eurasia! |
We have? Why did nobody tell me? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
exton
Forum Elder
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Posts: 4218
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 3:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| G-Max wrote: | | exton wrote: |
But that's not what you said. You said that he bombed iraq to distract from the impeachment hearings. |
No, that's what phunky said. |
No, it's what you said:
"Clinton cheated on his wife, lied about it under oath to 300 million people in violation of Federal law, and tried to avoid impeachment by killing 10, 000 Iraqis in bombing raids on civilian targets under the pretense of enforcing "no-fly" zones."
It's just one page back, too.
| Quote: |
| exton wrote: | | We've always been at war with eurasia! |
We have? Why did nobody tell me? |
[/quote]
Nevermind. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Spider Jerusalem
Not a Newbie
Joined: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 73
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 5:09 am Post subject: Re: Newt Gingrich Admits To Having Affair While Leading Clin |
|
|
|
| JesusLopezViejo wrote: |
Hypocrite much? What are your thoughts... |
It is, but he still holds the moral highground.
a) He had the balls to comeout to admit it. He didn't pussout and make an ass out of himself lieing in federal court and to the American people.
b) His adultry didn't waste billions of tax lawyers for lawyers, court battles, and investigations.
c) His adultry was more consentual. Clinton's was virtualy rape against several interns who were intimidated by Clinton's power over them.
d) Newt's adultry did not divert America's attention from more pressing matters. Like the rising threat of Aphganastain's radicals, the fact that we were moving toward a police state where SWAT Teams could break into your house and send little boys back to Cuba, and elections were becoming more and more shadey.
e) Newt tries his best to makeup for what he did by being a good person. What has Bill Clinton done lately to redeem himself? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
exton
Forum Elder
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Posts: 4218
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:43 am Post subject: Re: Newt Gingrich Admits To Having Affair While Leading Clin |
|
|
|
| Spider Jerusalem wrote: | | JesusLopezViejo wrote: |
Hypocrite much? What are your thoughts... |
It is, but he still holds the moral highground.
a) He had the balls to comeout to admit it. He didn't pussout and make an ass out of himself lieing in federal court and to the American people. |
Had the balls to come out and admit it...10 years later?
No, that's not good enough.
| Quote: |
b) His adultry didn't waste billions of tax lawyers for lawyers, court battles, and investigations. |
Neither did bill's.
Who wasted that money?
The people who impeached him.
(Newt)
| Quote: |
c) His adultry was more consentual. Clinton's was virtualy rape against several interns who were intimidated by Clinton's power over them. |
Right. Prove it.
| Quote: |
d) Newt's adultry did not divert America's attention from more pressing matters. Like the rising threat of Aphganastain's radicals, the fact that we were moving toward a police state where SWAT Teams could break into your house and send little boys back to Cuba, and elections were becoming more and more shadey. |
You do realize that newt was part of the people who impeached clinton, right?
| Quote: |
e) Newt tries his best to makeup for what he did by being a good person. What has Bill Clinton done lately to redeem himself? |
Redeem himself? For lying about a blowjob? Usually an "i'm sorry" suffices for that kind of offense - which he did.
But there's more. Wiki has a section on his humanitarian work.
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_clinton#Humanitarian_work
[/url] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lester
Forum Elder
Joined: 08 Dec 2006
Posts: 4650
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 11:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| exton wrote: | | jusdeadphunky wrote: |
| Quote: | | Yes, that's right, bubba bombed iraq to avoid impeachment. That makes plenty of sense. |
it can be argued that clinton bombed iraq to divert media attention from his impeachment proceedings. |
It can also be argued that i own an invisible pink unicorn.
Much like the argument you mention, though, it will inevitably fail. |
Can invisible beings have colour? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
exton
Forum Elder
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Posts: 4218
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Lester wrote: |
Can invisible beings have colour? |
No. Which is one good reason that the argument must fail. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
joeyjock
Forum Elder
Joined: 24 Dec 2006
Posts: 2108
Location: Fort Lauderdale
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 1:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
My God...
you're still rambling on about that witch hunt of an impeachment?
Most people in America would give their eye teeth to have Clinton back instead the the republican mess we have there now
To even compare Newt to Bill Clinton smacks as ludicrous
the lies and crimes of this administration make everything from Nixon...to Iran - Contra pale in comparison |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lester
Forum Elder
Joined: 08 Dec 2006
Posts: 4650
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 3:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| exton wrote: | | Lester wrote: |
Can invisible beings have colour? |
No. Which is one good reason that the argument must fail. |
I just thought it was a bit self-defeating to claim invisibility and pinkness.
Why do you have to redeem yourself if you get a blowjob btw? Can I just write a check to society? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
exton
Forum Elder
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Posts: 4218
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 2:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Lester wrote: |
Why do you have to redeem yourself if you get a blowjob btw? Can I just write a check to society? |
I'm not sure. Maybe it's all those millions of innocent sperm cells that get killed. If a person thinks that abortion is murder, then a blowjob must be a holocaust. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
