jusdeadphunky
Forum Elder
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
Posts: 2222
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lester
Forum Elder
Joined: 08 Dec 2006
Posts: 4650
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 6:02 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Baby shields take less time to make, only 9 months, sometimes even less. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jusdeadphunky
Forum Elder
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
Posts: 2222
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 2:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Lester wrote: | | Baby shields take less time to make, only 9 months, sometimes even less. |
you and this baby shit...sickening! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lester
Forum Elder
Joined: 08 Dec 2006
Posts: 4650
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 1:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I like babies. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jusdeadphunky
Forum Elder
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
Posts: 2222
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 4:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Lester wrote: | | I like babies. |
yea dead ones |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lester
Forum Elder
Joined: 08 Dec 2006
Posts: 4650
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Hey! In this topic the babies didn't die!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jusdeadphunky
Forum Elder
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
Posts: 2222
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Lester wrote: | | Hey! In this topic the babies didn't die!! |
yea but they were used as sheilds |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lester
Forum Elder
Joined: 08 Dec 2006
Posts: 4650
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 7:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I was just pointing out the efficiency of using them rather than full growed up peoples. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jusdeadphunky
Forum Elder
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
Posts: 2222
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 7:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Lester wrote: | | I was just pointing out the efficiency of using them rather than full growed up peoples. |
my bad
it would suck lugging around your baby shield all day. i mean you have to carry it as opposed to a full grown human shield that you would not have to carry and which you could get to haul your gear for you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lester
Forum Elder
Joined: 08 Dec 2006
Posts: 4650
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 7:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| That is indeed a good point, perhaps then the most efficient would be like 8-14?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
