Register :: Log in :: Profile :: Mail   
Federal Reserve

Home // Government Watch



Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Author Message
fellfire
Forum Elder
Forum Elder


Joined: 13 Apr 2007
Posts: 2021
Location: Washington DC

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 8:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Turk wrote:
Go back to myspace you and fell


Screw you, Liar.
Back to top
Lester
Forum Elder
Forum Elder


Joined: 08 Dec 2006
Posts: 4650

PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 12:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Gentlemen, please.
Back to top
forthechildren
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 8:18 pm    Post subject: martin vs mahoney Reply with quote
Well, I didn't read all 8 pages of this conversation that happened 2 years ago so maybe you've already discovered it, but in reference to questions on the first page of this blog mahoney vs martin did happen and the justice of the peace did die the following year. I typed "minnesota law suit mahoney 1968" and I strolled down to someone's question about it. Interesting how some people can be so aggressive and yet so ignorant.
Back to top
tom
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:05 am    Post subject: federal reserve act Reply with quote
you are spot on. Here is a qeustion I wanted answered. Bull or not. I read that after kennedy was asassinated the first thing done was to take the bill abolishing the federal reserve act and throw it out. I don't know if it is true or not because i have lost the source and never validated it, but it sure gets you thinking. Very Happy
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 1:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
The unresoved legal issue of Acts of Congress, and in this case the Federal Reserve Act, is whether an Act of Congress can nullify the body of the Constitution. The answer is undeniably "no". Several attempts were made on behalf of slaves following the Civil War to emancipate them. All Acts passed were rule illegal, as the Constitution required an amendment in order to legally deal with the issue. The 13th Amendment did just that, but still did not nullify the body of the Constitution (the Constitution may be added to, but not subtracted from - this is the legal view of the Constitution until the Progressive movements of the early 20th Century). Following emancipation, Congress attempted to ensure voting rights, the right to bear arms, the right to assemble, etc. to those men emancipated - but again, this was illegal, as an Amendment was required to create a separate classification of Citizen; this also provided for those born in a U.S. territory, as under the Constitution, they could not be counted as Natural Born Citizens. The 14th Amendment rectified this circumstance.

There are, then, two examples in which Acts of Congress were ruled illegal in attempts to change the body of the Constitution, as were Amendments - the 13th and 14th Amendments were additions, not subtractions. The Federal Reserve Act, as with the majority of Progressive legislation, is un-Constitutional. Remember, also, that the Law has not been correctly taught since the 1920s, and very few scholars examine the Constitution and the Jay and Marshall Courts, but rather, legislate from the bench according to passions, not Founding principle.

The Act and its amandments will ultimately be repealed, or else the fiat currency of the United States will lose all value, and result in the collapse of the Republic. President Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin warned of fiat currencies and bank-control of the National currency.
Back to top
keef
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 11:42 pm    Post subject: END THE FED Reply with quote
Lets set aside the argument of is the FED constitutional. Think about this: The FED is a group of privately owned, for-profit corporations. Its not federal and there are no reserves. They print their money out of thin air. They operate more secretly than the CIA. They charge the government interest on the currency it issues to us. Our income tax goes towards paying this interest. Booms and busts are a direct result of fractional reserve banking, and are used to consolidate wealth. Even if you want to argue that anything the government does can be considered constitutional, it doesn't mean its not the work of greedy wealthy bankster elites.
Back to top


Post new topic   Reply to topic   Quick Reply    LVC Home // Government Watch All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Page 8 of 8

 

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Add to My Yahoo! Add to Google

Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites Politics Blogs Politics
Politics blogs Politics blogs Article Directory Political Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory Top Blog Sites
My Big Breasts